Talk:Euclidean plane
From Knowino
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. | |
I released this article to Citizendium. In particular, the identical text that appears there is of my sole authorship. Therefore, no credit for Citizendium content on the Knowino applies. | |
Paul Wormer 06:06, 22 January 2012 (EST) |
These properties 1,2,3 are the definition of a metric space. Metric spaces are very, very diverse in their geometric properties. Few examples are given in our "metric space" article; a lot more can be given. The Euclidean plane is just one of them (one up to isometry, I mean). Properties 1,2,3 are a tiny part of its characterization. It looks for me rather like "Homo sapience is a piece of live matter. It has the properties to be born, to eat, to breed an to die." :-) --Boris Tsirelson 07:37, 22 January 2012 (EST)
- Please add the extra axioms that make a metric space into a Euclidean plane.--Paul Wormer 10:55, 22 January 2012 (EST)
- I would be glad to do so, but it is a hard way. No wonder that people prefer "2-dimensional affine space with inner product". In principle one can define a straight line in terms of the metric only, and then require the numerous axioms of the 2-dim Euclidean geometry treating straight lines as above. --Boris Tsirelson 13:32, 22 January 2012 (EST)
- Less elegant but more practical, if you like: Euclidean plane is a metric space whose points admit coordinates (x,y) such that the distance is
(and of course, the correspondence between the plane and all pairs of reals must be bijective). --Boris Tsirelson 14:39, 22 January 2012 (EST)
- Less elegant but more practical, if you like: Euclidean plane is a metric space whose points admit coordinates (x,y) such that the distance is
- I extended the article along these lines.--Paul Wormer 08:02, 24 January 2012 (EST)
- As far as I understand, a point R belongs to the straight line containing P and Q (these being different) if and only if R satisfies at least one of the following three equalities:
- ρ(R,P) + ρ(P,Q) = ρ(R,Q);
- ρ(P,R) + ρ(R,Q) = ρ(P,Q);
- ρ(P,Q) + ρ(Q,R) = ρ(P,R).
- But I do not understand what does "λρ(P,R) + (1 − λ)ρ(R,Q) = ρ(P,Q)" mean. (Maybe rather "R = λP + (1 − λ)Q"? but this is in terms of affine space rather than metric space.)
- See also Line (geometry)#Definitions. Boris Tsirelson 11:45, 24 January 2012 (EST)
- As far as I understand, a point R belongs to the straight line containing P and Q (these being different) if and only if R satisfies at least one of the following three equalities:
- Yes I screwed up. What do you think if I say two equations:
- ρ(P,R) = λρ(P,Q)
- ρ(R,Q) = (1-λ)ρ(P,Q)
- determine a straight line with 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1? (BTW, I don't know what λP means.) --Paul Wormer 12:04, 24 January 2012 (EST)
- Yes I screwed up. What do you think if I say two equations:
- Yes, the two equations can be used; but isn't it a longer way to say just "ρ(P,R) + ρ(R,Q) = ρ(P,Q)"?
- Also, "Note that a part of a line is not a line. In particular, a line segment is not a line." (quoted from Line (geometry)#Definitions)
- BTW, yes, a linear combination in general is well-defined for points of a linear space, not of an affine space; however, when the sum of coefficients is equal to 1 (so-called affine combination), it is well-defined for points of an affine space. Thus, λP means nothing, but still, λP+(1-λ)Q means a point. --Boris Tsirelson 12:31, 24 January 2012 (EST)
- "It follows from the triangle inequality that this path of minimum length is unique" – really, follows? Here is a counterexample. Consider the four-point metric space {A,B,C,D} with ρ(A,B)=1, ρ(A,C)=1, ρ(B,C)=1, ρ(B,D)=1, ρ(C,D)=1, ρ(A,D)=2. It is a metric space, indeed. However, both B and C are "between" A and D. --Boris Tsirelson 15:13, 25 January 2012 (EST)
- And here is a better counterexample: just the plane with the metric | x1 − x2 | + | y1 − y2 | rather than
. There are a lot of shortest paths from (0,0) to (1,1). One of them goes through (1,0); another one through (0,1). --Boris Tsirelson 05:04, 26 January 2012 (EST)
- I gave up trying to define straight lines. After all, points and angles were defined neither. --Paul Wormer 05:27, 27 January 2012 (EST)