Talk:Riemann zeta function

From Knowino
Revision as of 18:56, 31 May 2011 by Boris Tsirelson (talk | contributions)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

"The paper includes the general definition of the zeta function (including the first use of the symbol ζ to denote it) and the proof of its analytic continuation" --- really? what is "proof of analytic continuation"? proof of its existence? of some its properties? or what? --Boris Tsirelson 14:49, 31 May 2011 (EDT)

Special values: "This is valid for every integer k > 0, as the values of the zeta function at nonpositive integers are all 0." --- really, nonpositive? or maybe noneven (that is, odd)? --Boris Tsirelson 14:56, 31 May 2011 (EDT)

Personal tools