Gas-phase Astrochemistry
Text: Ewine van Dishoeck, 16 oct 2009
Topic 1: Photodissociation processes
In any region in which UV photons can penetrate, photodissociation is
the major destruction mechanism of (neutral) gas-phase molecules. This
includes diffuse and translucent clouds, dense clouds exposed to
intense UV from nearby young stars (so-called Photodissociation or
Photon-Dominated Regions, PDRs) in our own and other galaxies, the
envelopes around evolved stars, and the surface layers of
protoplanetary disks. Even deep inside dense clouds, the UV photons
produced by the interaction of cosmic rays with H2 provide a weak
field which can dissociate both gas-phase and solid-state molecules
(ices). Photodissociation processes may well be responsible for the
isotopic anomalies observed in meteorites in our own solar system: how
and where did this happen? While data on a number of molecules are
available from the older literature (see
www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/~ewine/photo for overview), information on
several key rates and processes is lacking.
In this topic, unique Dutch theoretical and experimental expertise on
photodissociation processes will be brought together to address a number of
outstanding questions in (astro)chemistry:
- what are the photodissociation rates and mechanisms of key small
molecules in astrochemistry, in particular N2 and CO? How does this
vary among the isotopologues and what is the importance of self- and
mutual shielding?
- what are the branching ratios of the photodissociation products,
especially for > triatomic molecules? For example, does CH3OH
dissociate primarily to CH3 + OH, CH2OH + H, or CH2
+ H2O, etc.? How
does this depend on photon energy?
- do the branching ratios change between molecules in the gas and ices?
(link with "Solid-state astrochemistry" theme)
- how stable are complex organic molecules (non-PAHs) against UV
radiation? Where does the cross-over from very efficient
dissociation as found for small molecules to highly stable because
of internal conversion as found for large molecules occur? How does
this depend on the structure of the molecule?
Topic 2: Inelastic collisions
Because of their rich energy level structure, molecules are excellent
probes of the physical conditions in which they reside. Their
abundances can also serve as chemical diagnostics of, for example, the
evolutionary state of the sources. In order to extract any information
about temperatures, densities and abundances, the state-to-state
collisional rate coefficients need to be known over a range of
temperatures (typically 10 K - few hundred K). These can only be
determined by a combination of experiments and theory. Experimental
determinations of individual cross sections at specific energies are
crucial to benchmark the theoretical efforts.
Over the last decades, there have been significant efforts in
computing and measuring collisional rate coefficients for
astrophysically relevant molecules with the main collision partners H2
and H. This, in turn, also provides new challenges for basic chemical
physics on treating open shell molecules (e.g., OH) and both para- and
ortho- H2 properly. A summary up to a few years ago is given by
Schoeier et al. 2005 (Astronomy & Astrophysics) and the relevant data
are summarized in an easy-to-access form at
www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/~moldata.
The Molecular Universe EU network has
been very active in the last few years in providing new data on a
number of species, most importantly H2O, crucial for interpretation of
upcoming Herschel data.
Most recently, observations using the Spitzer Space Telescope combined
with ground-based 8-m class telescopes have detected a wealth of
mid-infrared (3-30 micron = 333-3333 cm-1) lines of small molecules like CO, HCN,
C2H2, CO2, H2O and OH.
These are mostly the vibration-rotation lines
(but in the case of H2O and OH also very highly excited pure
rotational lines). Very little is known about collisional rate
coefficients for vibration rotation transitions; even for "simple"
systems like CO-H or CO-H2 uncertainties are still an order of
magnitude.
The goal of this topic would be to define a number of astrophysically
relevant systems to study in a combined theory-experimental effort.
For both topic 1 and 2, the molecular data would subsequently be
incorporated into state-of-the-art molecular excitation and radiative
transfer models and applied to interpretations of observations of
molecules in star-forming regions, protoplanetary disks and
extragalactic regions.
Photodissociation and excitation of molecules in protoplanetary disks
Ewine van Dishoeck, 19 oct 2009
N2 photodissociation (and CO)
N2 is the dominant nitrogen-bearing molecule in dense clouds, but can
only be observed indirectly through tracers like N2H+. Recent
observations and models have suggested that not all nitrogen is
converted to molecular form even inside a dense cloud but that a
significant fraction is still atomic (e.g., Maret et al. 2006, Nature
442, 425). Similarly, models of the surface layers of protoplanetary
disks suggest that whether a star has sufficient UV radiation or not
to photodissociate N2 affects the nitrogen chemistry (Pascucci et
al. 2009, ApJ 696, 143). Finally, large 15N/14N ratios have been
observed in some meteoritic material (e.g., Alexander et al. 1998,
Meteor. Planet. Sci. 33, 603), interplanetary dust particles (e.g.,
Messenger et al. 2003, Spa. Sci. Rev. 106, 155) and comets (e.g.,
Arpigny et al. 2003, Science 301, 1522), which are thought to
originate in the interstellar cloud. One possible explanation is
isotope selective photodissociation, along the same lines as invoked
and demonstrated for CO to explain 12C/13C and
16O/18O/17O anomalies
in clouds and meteorites (Visser et al. 2009, A&A).
In contrast with CO, the N2 photodissociation in interstellar clouds
has never been treated properly. This is mostly because of lack of
accurate molecular data for the very highly excited (Rydberg)
electronic states through which the photodissociation occurs. Thanks
to the detailed experimental and theoretical work of Glenn Stark,
Brenton Lewis and collaborators, much of this data is now
available. The first step would be to collect all the relevant
(J-dependent) line positions, oscillator strengths and predissociation
rates for 14N2 and 14N15N
and to compute the photodissociation rates
with depth into a simple cloud model and check where self-shielding
and mutual shielding by H2 and CO could occur. This study will also
reveal where there is still a lack of data (or need for higher
accuracy), which could then be obtained either through additional
experiments at Amsterdam and/or theory at Nijmegen.
The second step would be to consider both 14N2 and
14N15N and compute
the isotope selective photodissociation rates into realistic cloud
models with and without grain growth. The final step would be to
include the processes into a protoplanetary disk model and investigate
the influence on the chemistry and isotope selective
photodissociation.
This project will take at least 1 year work of the PhD student, with
support from postdoc Ruud Visser and myself.
An extension of this project would be to update the CO
photodissociation model by Visser et al. as new molecular data become
available. Glenn Stark is starting a new set of measurements, in
collaboration with Brenton Lewis for the analysis. This may be an area
for Gerrit (and perhaps Wim) to get involved in as well; the
predissociation processes are not well understood for CO. As a result,
the J-dependent oscillator strengths and predissociation rates are not
at all well known for the rarer CO isotopologues.
Photodissociation of larger molecules
The plan in Leiden would be to
- a) search the literature on
experimental data on photodissociation of large organic molecules of
astrophysical interest like CH3OCH3, HCOOCH3,
C2H5CN,
- b) use
(modified) RRKM theory (see also papers M. Gruebele) to compute their
stability of molecules and compare - where possible - with
experiments.
Such calculations have been done for PAHs (see Visser et
al. 2007, A&A for recent results) but never for other large complex
organic molecules. Although they won't be accurate to better than an
order of magnitude, they may give some (qualitative) information on
photodissociation efficiencies. I would appreciate comments from
experts on whether this is at all a feasible approach.
The second important question is the products of photodissociation. In
my view, this can only be approached by experiments such as done in
Nijmegen. In Leiden, we could then incorporate the results into
astrochemical models, investigate effects on abundances and compare
with observations. We would also update the photo website so that the
astrochemical community has easy access to the results.
Water photodissociation
Now that OH has been detected in high rotational states consistent
with photodissociation of H2O through the B state, there may be
further need for model results on the OH excitation. To be discussed
with Marc, cf. the van Harrevelt & van Hemert results.
Molecular excitation
In order to interpret the infrared data on CO, H2O, CO2,
HCN, C2H2,
..., the vibration-rotation inelastic cross sections need to be
known. Most urgent is CO + H2 and CO + H. As far as I know, the rate
coefficients for these systems are still highly uncertain, see summary
in Gonzalez-Alfonso et al. (2002, A&A 386, 1074, section 4.1.2) and
Najita et al. (1996, ApJ 462, 919, Appendix B). For the case of CO2,
see the Appendix of Boonman et al. (2003, A&A 399, 1047), and more
generally David Flower's book on inelastic collisions.
I know that Laurent Wiesenfeld has been working on H2O-H2
vibration-rotation transitions and perhaps some other species, so you
may want to discuss this when he is visiting Nijmegen (this
week?). The Leiden component would be to incorporate these rate
coefficients into molecular excitation and radiative transfer models
to simulate the infrared emission spectra from protoplanetary disks.
Groningen is also interested in this (e.g., Inga Kamp's models), and
in making the rate coefficients available through the LAMDA database
and applying them to other astrophysical situations (e.g., high-mass
YSOs, Floris).
Last updated: October 20, 2009, by Gerrit C. Groenenboom,