Applied Quantum Chemistry, NWI-MOL106
(Lecturer until 2018: Prof. Gerrit C. Groenenboom)
- Prospectus (September 2018)
- Schedule (September 2018)
- Book: Ian Fleming, Molecular Orbitals and Organic Chemical Reactions,
Student Ed. (Wiley, 2009), ISBN: 978-0-470-74660-8
- Guest lectures week 5+6: Wednesday, 4-October-2018 and 11-October-2018, Prof. Matthias Bickelhaupt
jsme
Lectures
Week 1, Frontier orbitals and the theory of acids and bases
- week1.pdf
- Born-Oppenheimer approximation
- Slater-determinant
- Hartree-Fock/Roothaan, Fock-operator
- Semi-empirical methods, AM1, PM3, PM6, MOPAC
- Denisty functional theory (DFT)
- Acids and bases, Arrhenius, Brønsted, Lewis
- Conjugate acids and bases
- pKa and Gibbs free energy:
$pK_a = \frac{\Delta G}{RT\ln(10)}$
- Solvent effects, Born continuum model
- FERMO vs HOMO
Week 2, Frontier orbital theory of reactivity
- week2.pdf
- Thermodynamics vs kinetics, Hammond postulate (Fleming 3.3)
- Perturbation approach to reactivity (Fleming 3.4)
- MO theory, Salem-Klopman equation (third term, Fleming 3.5)
- -C, -Z, -X Substituents (Fleming 2.1 and 6.5.1)
- Hückel theory with hetero atoms (Fleming 1.7.4, Table 1.2)
- Aromaticity, anti-aromaticy and isodesmic reactions
Week 3, effects of charges, reactivity indices
- week3a.pdf, week3b.pdf
- Mulliken charges
- Bond order
- Ambident electrophiles and nucleophiles (Fleming, 4.3)
- Hard and soft acids and bases (Fleming 3.2)
- Salem-Klopman equation (Fleming 3.5)
- Reactivity indices
- Fukui functions, indices
- Super-deloclizability
enolate ion 4.3.2)
Warning: there are some errors in Fleming:
- Equation (4.6)[Reference edition] has an incorrect minus sign in the
denominator. The correct formula is:
\[
f=2\frac{c_3^2+c_2^2e^{-D\Delta\lambda}}{1+e^{-D\Delta\lambda}}
\]
[See Fukui et al., J. Chem. Phys. 22, 1433 (1954),
doi]
- Equation (4.7), the denominator should be E_j-α
(for Hückel theory):
\[
s_r = \sum_{j}^{\mathrm{occ}} \frac{c_j^2}{E_j-\alpha}
\]
In MOPAC α can be
replaced with the average of the HOMO and LUMO energies.
Week 4
- week4.pdf
- Pericyclic reactions (Fleming 6)
- Woodward-Hoffmann rules (Fleming 6.3)
- Orbital correlation diagram (Fleming 6.4.3)
- Cyclo-additions, supra-/antara-facial (Fleming Fig 6.2)
- Electrocyclic reactions, con- and dis-rotatory
- Sigmatropic shifts, retention/inversion
Week 5, lecture Matthias Bickelhaupt (I)
Week 6, lecture Matthias Bickelhaupt (II)
Week 7, Intermolecular interactions
- week7.pdf
- Exchange interaction
- Electrostatic interactions
- Dipole-dipole interaction
- Induction
- Dispersion
Lecture notes by Prof. Ad van der Avoird (pdf) -
we mainly discussed part 2 "Intermolecular forces"
Computer class
This is the web-interface to run MOPAC2016 and Hückel calculations
Week 1, estimating the acidity of molecules
Study the correlation of pKa's of molecules with the energy of frontier orbitals, try these:
- Use the PM6 hamiltonian (implemented in MOPAC2016)
- HOMO or LUMO of the acid
- HOMO or LUMO of the conjugate base
- Use the FERMO instead (see paper of R. da Silva below)
- Do calculations with and without solvent effects
- Try the relation pKa = delta(G)/(R*T*ln(10))
- A good start are the molecules on page 6 of the table of the Evans group (link below) and: HF, HCl, HBr, HCN (page 1)
- Compare the solvent effect on the pKa of a neutral molecule and
- MOPAC gives energy in kcal/mol, gas constant: R=1.9872 cal/K/mol
on for a molecular ion
- Try calculating the pKa of water
- Try calculating the pKa of different protons in a molecule
Sources of pKa's:
Week 2, Conjugation and substituent effects
Relevant parts of the book:
- π-conjugated molecules and Hückel theory is described in Fleming 1.4
- Aromaticity and anti-aromaticity is discussed in Fleming 1.5-1.5.3
- Hückel theory for molecules with hetero atoms is discussed in Fleming 1.7.4
- -C, -Z, and -X type substituents are defined in the Fleming, 2.1.1, Fig 2
- The effect on orbital energies are given in 6.5.1, page 223
Assignment:
- Calculate energy levels and HOMO-LUMO gap for linear conjugated systems of N carbons (ethylene, allyl, butadiene, hexatriene, etc.)
with Hückel and with MOPAC/PM6. Compare with equation 1.10 in the the book:
\[
E = 2 \beta \cos \frac{k\pi}{N+1}, \;\;\; \mbox{for $k=1,2,...,N$}
\]
- Test additivity of hydrogenation enthalpy for a system with
two not-conjugated pi-bonds (e.g. H2C=CH-CH2-C=CH-CH3 + n H2, with n=1,2)
- Calculate the hydrogenation of a molecule with two conjugated pi-bonds
(but with exact same atoms, e.g. H3C-CH=CH2-C=CH-CH3 + n H2)
- Compare hydrogenation enthalpies (PM6) with Hückel delocalization energies
- Check the theory of aromaticity/anti-aromaticity (cyclic systems with either 4n+2 or 4n π electrons)
with Hückel calculations for cyclopentadienyl anion and cation. Also compare
the cyclic structures with the corresponding linear structures.
- Take your favorite π conjugated molecule and check the substituent effects
described in the book (Fig 2.1 and Section 6.5.1 - page 60 and 223 in the student edition). Use Hückel to investigate
the π electrons and MOPAC for combined effects. Note: in the "view" panel
there is an "edit" button, which pops up a new panel. Select the "labels"
button to find the labels of the atoms matching the output file, click
again to get the atomic charges. There is also a button for bond-orders.
- 1,3,5,7-Cyclooctatetraene should
be anti-aromatic. Use PM6 to optimize the singlet and the triplet state.
Look at the heat of formation - what is wrong? Find the explanation
by looking at bond-distances and bond-orders, and calculate the
singlet state with 1SCF for the geometry optimized at the
triplet state, and vice versa.
- According to Fleming, Section 1.4.3 (page 31 in the student edition), Hückel; theory breaks down for
long polyenes. This is particularly true if there are small
perturbations that would not have any effect in Hückel theory:
introduce some -CH3 substituents, s-cis configurations, -CH2-CH2-X
substituents etc. This is a general phenomenon of waves known in condensed
matter physics as Anderson
localization.
Week 3, Substituent effects on the stability of carbocations
Week 4
Fleming 4.3.3.3 discusses the regioselectivity of the rates for electrophilic
attack of hard and soft electrophiles on dienolate ions. We will study
the reaction of compound 4.45b with MeI.
- Fleming states that 4.45b is a better representation of the dienolate ion than
4.45a. Check this statement with a Hückel calculation and with a semi-empirical
calculation. Think of all possible ways to use the calculations to do the check.
- Use MOPAC to determine which is the most stable product thermodynamically,
will the methyl group be on carbon number 2, 3, or 4?
- Compute the MOs and the orbital energies of the reactants to determine which orbital
interaction is expected to control the reaction rates for soft electrophiles.
- What would the calculations predict for hard electrophiles?
- In sectio 4.3.3.3 Fleming claims that Hückel theory, in combination with HSAB theory, gives
the wrong prediction for the reactive site for a soft electrophile reacting with a dienolate ion.
Verify this claim, and check whether a MOPAC calculation gives the correct prediction
(orient the molecule as explained here).
Chapter 7 of Fleming is on radical reactions:
- Study Fleming 7.1 and check it with Hückel and MOPAC calculations.
Extra material:
Week 5
- Note: to make a radical with JSME use the +/- button, but use the default charge
in MOPAC.
- To find these structures by name activate the "NIH" button
in the JSME panel, then right-click and select the option "Paste any chemical text repr."
- The polymerization of dimethyl fumarate and vinyl acetate proceeds in an
alternating fashion. Study the structures of both compounds and give an
explanation for the observed alternating copolymerization. Test your theory
with MOPAC calculations.
- Apply the same theory to the copolymerzation of maleic anhydride and
styrene and butadiene and styrene with MOPAC.
More literature on reactive indices
- (Superdelocalisability): Theory of substitution in Conjugated Molecules, K. Fukui, T. Yonezawa
and C. Nagata, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 27, 423 (1954).
- Application of superdelocalisability to nitration:
Quantitative frontier orbital theory: Part I. Electrophilic aromatic substitution,
Robert J. Elliott, Valerie Sackwild, W.Graham Richards, J. Mol. Struct, Theochem, 86, 301 (1982)
Web resources
Checklist for the report:
Make sure to have:
- A title
- Name/names + student number
- Date
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Method/results/discussion (or some combination of these)
- Conclusion
- References
Content:
- Provide details that would be needed to reproduce the results.
Make sure to:
- Define all abbreviations the first time they are used (treat the
abstract as a "separate text", so it may be published independently).
- Number your pages.
- Number equations.
- Equations are part of a sentence, and may have comma or period
at the end.
- Give units - use symbol (e.g. N), or write in lower case (newton).
- Use spelling checker.
- All Tables and Figures must have captions.
- The main text should refer to all figures and tables
in the order in which they appear in the report.
- Use only one type of paragraph (alinea), e.g., a new paragraph
starts at a new line with indentation, or always separate paragraphs by empty line.
Extra hints for the report of the first week's assignement:
- Send the report as pdf file (not doc!) to
gerritg at theochem.ru.nl
- Make sure your name, student number, and the date are in the report
- Pages must be numbered
- No abstract is required, introduction can be short, however:
- The results in your report must be well defined - which method
was used, which Hamiltonian, the structure of the molecule
(a figure helps!), which solvent (for calculated as well
as experimental pKa), etc
- It is OK to use tables, but to show correlations always
make a plot
- Make sure that the data in the plot is well defined, axes
must be labeled, it must be clear which molecules the
points in the plot refer to.
- If some points are clearly not in line with the others,
try to identify what may be reason.
- If you test the use of, e.g., HOMO and FERMO energies, it
should be easy to see whether the FERMO is equal to the HOMO
or not. If not, is it the HOMO-1, HOMO-2, ...?
It may help to put the experimental pKa on the x-axis, so
it is easier to compare plots that contain the same molecules,
but different methods to determin the pKa
- If the choice of the FERMO was not easy, show the plots of the
orbitals
- Use the various orbital correlations, and also try the
formula for the pKa
- Summarize the main conclusions
Previous exams
HTML5-validator
Last updated: 6-Sept-2018, by Gerrit C. Groenenboom.